<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Syrian Gambit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://total.eclipse.co.il/2006/12/17/the-syrian-gambit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://total.eclipse.co.il/2006/12/17/the-syrian-gambit/</link>
	<description>A site for sore eyes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eran Sandler</title>
		<link>http://total.eclipse.co.il/2006/12/17/the-syrian-gambit/comment-page-1/#comment-7898</link>
		<dc:creator>Eran Sandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://total.eclipse.co.il/?p=90#comment-7898</guid>
		<description>Now is the time to break out the big cannons. We need full time, fully working and fully reasonable strategists (and we have more than a few here and outside).

While I don&#039;t know Assad personally I doubt he thought about this move alone and I&#039;m quite sure it in-sync with other Iranian intentions that will be revealed over time.

We need to stop thinking and acting by impulse (which we continue to do not only in the security/diplomatic arena, but with every other thing in this country) and start drafting drafts for a long and painful battle of the minds.

This is, in part, the first fires of a new cold war with a new terror balance and we should start acting accordingly and start thinking a bit more to the future than 10 minutes.

I think that the first steps is to &quot;fall&quot; into the Syrian trap and start negotiating. Unfortunately they acted first and we don&#039;t have the luxury of not following on. While it may legitimize to some extent Syria&#039;s continued support in terror, we can (or should I say &quot;might&quot;) call the bluff on this one (as we should).

At this point in time I do fear the war is an inevitable step towards a better middle-east. There are too many participants with too many interests and it seems that post-war middle east will probably be a cleaner slate to start drafting upon a better future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now is the time to break out the big cannons. We need full time, fully working and fully reasonable strategists (and we have more than a few here and outside).</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t know Assad personally I doubt he thought about this move alone and I&#8217;m quite sure it in-sync with other Iranian intentions that will be revealed over time.</p>
<p>We need to stop thinking and acting by impulse (which we continue to do not only in the security/diplomatic arena, but with every other thing in this country) and start drafting drafts for a long and painful battle of the minds.</p>
<p>This is, in part, the first fires of a new cold war with a new terror balance and we should start acting accordingly and start thinking a bit more to the future than 10 minutes.</p>
<p>I think that the first steps is to &#8220;fall&#8221; into the Syrian trap and start negotiating. Unfortunately they acted first and we don&#8217;t have the luxury of not following on. While it may legitimize to some extent Syria&#8217;s continued support in terror, we can (or should I say &#8220;might&#8221;) call the bluff on this one (as we should).</p>
<p>At this point in time I do fear the war is an inevitable step towards a better middle-east. There are too many participants with too many interests and it seems that post-war middle east will probably be a cleaner slate to start drafting upon a better future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

